← All methods

The GRIM Test: Is This Reported Mean Even Mathematically Possible?

GRIM (Granularity-Related Inconsistency of Means) is one of the lightest research-data checks: using only the sample size n and mean M printed in the paper, it determines whether that mean is mathematically possible at all — no raw data required.

Try the GRIM online check →

How it works

If every measurement is a multiple of some granularity g (questionnaire scores, rating scales, and counts are usually integers, g=1), then the true total of n observations must also be a multiple of g. A mean reported to d decimal places implies the true mean lies within M ± 0.5×10⁻ᵈ — so the true total must fall between n × (M − 0.5×10⁻ᵈ) and n × (M + 0.5×10⁻ᵈ).

If that interval contains no multiple of g, then no possible dataset of n observations could produce this mean — at least one of the mean, the sample size, or the reported precision is wrong.

A worked example

A paper reports: n = 20, mean M = 3.42 (integer-scored scale).

  • Rounding tolerance on the mean: ±0.005
  • Feasible-total interval: 20 × (3.415, 3.425) = (68.30, 68.50)
  • No integer exists in that interval — GRIM-inconsistent: a sum of 20 integers must be an integer, and 68.3–68.5 contains none.

With M = 3.45 instead: the interval is (68.90, 69.10), which contains 69 → consistent.

Applicability

  • Observations are multiples of the given granularity (integer scores, rating scales, counts)
  • n is the final sample size included in the computation (use the post-exclusion n)
  • The mean is an arithmetic mean, not a median or geometric mean
  • Not applicable to continuous physical measurements (granularity far below reported precision)

What a GRIM failure actually means

GRIM flags mathematical inconsistency, not proof of fabrication. Possible causes: data fabrication, post-hoc sample exclusions without updating n, typos, non-standard rounding, or a wrong guess about the granularity. Its academic role is as a “line of questioning worth pursuing” — combined with terminal digit analysis, Benford's Law, and other statistical fingerprints for real screening value.

Source

Brown NJL, Heathers JAJ (2017). The GRIM Test: A Simple Technique Detects Numerous Anomalies in the Reporting of Results in Psychology. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 363–369.

Related: GRIMMER (SD consistency), SPRITE (reconstructing plausible datasets from summary statistics), statcheck (recomputing reported p-values).

⚠️ Important: GRIM and every method on this site are screening aids. No single anomaly is sufficient to determine data fabrication. Final determinations must be made by competent institutions through due process.

Related methods