Detect Suspicious Data Patterns
in Research Papers

No raw data? No problem. Check reported statistics against sample sizes with the GRIM and SPRITE tests, recompute reported p-values with statcheck-lite, or paste any dataset for a 30-second statistical anomaly screening — Benford's Law, terminal digit analysis, variance checks. Research-grade methods, no sign-up required.

🔒 Processed locally — nothing uploaded or stored⚖️ A screening aid, not a misconduct determination📊 Based on published statistical methods

📄 Drop a PDF here or click to upload

Auto-extracts table data · never leaves your browser

🔒 Data is processed locally in your browser — never uploaded, never stored.

Why statistical screening?

Statistical forensics uses well-established methods to flag data that may be too clean, too random, or too patterned. These are the same techniques used by research integrity investigators.

GRIM Test

Mean–granularity consistency

Only the sample size n and mean M as printed in the paper: is that mean mathematically possible? (Brown & Heathers, 2017). No raw data needed.

Read the method →

SPRITE Test

Mean–SD consistency

GRIM's big sibling: is the reported n + M + SD combination possible given the measurement granularity and scale bounds? Catches SDs that are too small or too large (Peeters et al., 2016).

Read the method →

Statcheck (p-value Recomputation)

Exact p-value recalculation

Scans reported t/F/χ²/r/z statistics, recomputes the exact p-value, and flags reporting inconsistencies and significance decision errors (Nuijten et al., 2016).

Read the method →

Benford's Law

Leading-digit distribution

Natural data's leading digits follow a specific distribution (1 ≈ 30%, 9 ≈ 4.6%). Fabricated 'random' data often deviates.

Read the method →

Terminal Digit Analysis

Last-digit uniformity

Real measurements have uniformly distributed last digits. Hand-made data often favors 0 and 5 (Mosimann, 1995).

Read the method →

Variance Anomaly

Too-clean data screen

Real data varies naturally. Fabricated data is often 'too clean' — tiny variance, perfect fits, p-values clustered at 0.04–0.05.

Digit Pair Frequency

Adjacent-repeat rate

Non-leading digits should be roughly uniform. Deliberately avoiding adjacent repeats is itself a fabrication fingerprint.

Citation Verification

Crossref reference check

Fabricated references are the paper mill's most common flaw. Paste a reference list and verify every entry against the public Crossref database.

Read the method →

Pricing

🎉 Every feature is free during launch — no registration required. Pro features (batch screening, report library) will be announced here before they ship — start using it now.

Current

Free

$0
  • ✓All detection methods
  • ✓Multi-group GRIM & SPRITE
  • ✓Statcheck p-value recomputation
  • ✓PDF report export
  • ✓Local processing, zero upload
Start Free

Pro

$9/mo (planned)
  • ✓Batch screening
  • ✓Report library & history
  • ✓Higher data limits
  • ✓Priority support
Coming soon

Lifetime

$149 (planned)
  • ✓All Pro benefits
  • ✓One-time payment
  • ✓Great for lab budgets
Coming soon